Jeff Howe coined the term crowdsourcing in a Wired article in 2006. Since then, crowdsourcing has been hyped as the star way to raise funds, develop new products, and gather knowledge in a process driven by public engagement. Once called the wave of the future, crowdsourcing is now ubiquitous, with new technology assisting us as we draw on the resources of our communities in novel ways.
Today,
we have the ability to collectively build knowledge on Wikipedia,
map crises with Ushahidi, fund creative
projects on Kickstarter, take freeclasses online using Open Source software, provide loans through Kiva, rate businesses on Yelp, support environmental projects with ioby, design solutions for social good with OpenIDEO, subsidize social entrepreneurs
through StartSomeGood, improve
neighborhoods with Neighborland, along
with countless other opportunities taking form every day.
![]() |
| LADD used the Ushahidi platform to map the Gulf Oil Spill |
For impressive crowdsourcing feats, Crowdsourcing.org (mecca for all things crowdsourced) has a hall
of fame of seminal moments in crowdsourcing, both before and after the
term’s creation.
We can see in many of these examples that by opening doors
for contributions and collaboration, crowdsourcing has become an important tool for
public good.
Scientific and technological advancements are being made, government bodies work to address public concerns through open government platforms, and urban planning is evolving to incorporate the community more. For example, the 2012 TED prize is sponsoring TheCity2.org, a crowdsourcing platform to help citizens engage in reshaping their cities.
Scientific and technological advancements are being made, government bodies work to address public concerns through open government platforms, and urban planning is evolving to incorporate the community more. For example, the 2012 TED prize is sponsoring TheCity2.org, a crowdsourcing platform to help citizens engage in reshaping their cities.
The value of the crowdsourcing approach is, quite obviously,
in the crowd. I won’t take Joe Schmoes’s cock-eyed, ALL CAPS rant about a
restaurant in a Yelp review seriously without knowing if he’s a credible
source. However, I am more inclined to steer clear of that restaurant if I see
400 people have collectively scored it low. I refer to Wikipedia to quickly
settle bar bets because of the expectation that enough people have looked at
the entry on which I’m relying that any errors will have been
removed. Open IDEO, an online platform
that poses challenges to find potential answers to social problems, relies on
having a large base of ideas from which the crowd can refine and retool and
evaluate solutions.
In crowdsourcing, without quantity, quality can suffer. So, the key question in accessing the power of crowdsourcing is: "How can we build a community that is engaged, that cares, that participates?"
| A challenge on OpenIDEO |
In crowdsourcing, without quantity, quality can suffer. So, the key question in accessing the power of crowdsourcing is: "How can we build a community that is engaged, that cares, that participates?"
And that, my friends, is an age old question.
How would you answer it? Let us know in the comments below.
*For more information on crowdsourcing, check out these resources:
- Mashable: 4 Real Challenges to Crowdsourcing for Social Good
- Don Tapscott and Anthony D. Williams: Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything
- Clay Shirky: Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations


No comments:
Post a Comment